Patient Advocacy, Micro and Macro

Michael Lockshin, MD and his patient Alida Brill wrote a book about the physician-patient partnership -- how it feels to be a clinician and a patient working together in empathy to decide on patient care. In this case, the patient (Ms. Brill) was suffering from the autoimmune disease Wegener's Granulamatosis. I recommend their book as a good one to understand how to engage in a dialogue, not a monologue, over treatment.

But Dr. Lockshin also spent some time working at the National Institutes of Health on policy, and he had something to say about how the dialogue with patient advocates can help or hinder the advancement of their goals:

I also learned the politics of policy. I should have known, but did not at the time, that in policy decisions, when convictions are deeply held, truth does not matter unless it can be cogently sold. I repeatedly watched people present their cases truthfully but poorly and thereby lose arguments that they should have easily won. I saw people who were untruthful and wrong speak fervently and compellingly and win, and I saw that, as a result of these false arguments, misdirected policy would ensue. During my stay in Bethesda Lyme disease, breast implants, fibromyalgia, and animal research advocates and detractors found themselves unable to negotiate positions civilly. The resulting policy was at times incoherent and often ignored. (page 141)

Whether it is a dialogue between doctor and patient, or between advocate and legislator, we must strive to work together in partnership, or we might be left out of the collaboration altogether.


Brill, A. and Lockshin, M.D. (2009). Dancing at the River's Edge: A Patient and her Doctor Negotiate Life with Chronic Illness. Tucson: Schaffner Press.